Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

In which case did the court rule that a person's right to privacy outweighed their location? That is,the person's expectation of privacy as opposed to the place that would have an expectation of privacy?


A) Tennessee v Garner
B) Mapp v Ohio
C) Katz v U.S.
D) Miranda v Arizona

E) A) and C)
F) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

According to the privacy doctrine,the Fourth Amendment protects places,not persons.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Fourth Amendment does not protect what the senses perceive in public places.Public places do NOT include:


A) public parks.
B) private businesses open to the public.
C) streets.
D) employees-only areas of private businesses.

E) A) and D)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Looking through abandoned property is not a Fourth Amendment search.For property to be considered abandoned,there must be_________to throw the property away and acts that prove this.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The discovery of evidence by means of a law enforcement officer's ordinary senses in any place where the officer has a lawful right to be is not a search.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The open fields doctrine protects land from intrusion where owners have put up "no trespassing" signs.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Identify the two conditions that can turn an encounter with the police into a Fourth Amendment seizure.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

There are two conditions that can turn a...

View Answer

What effect has the Fourth Amendment search and seizure conditions had on American criminal procedure?


A) It has assisted in protecting a notion of privacy for individuals.
B) It has given the police unrestricted abilities to conduct searches.
C) It has greatly limited personal expectations of liberty in public places.
D) It has guaranteed that law enforcement can act arbitrarily to gather facts.

E) C) and D)
F) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

According to the Supreme Court opinion in California v.Greenwood involving incriminating evidence found in defendant's trash,citizens have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their trash.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following places is/are not likely to be considered part of the curtilage?


A) A garage
B) A pool
C) Warehouses on the same property
D) A porch

E) A) and C)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Fourth Amendment only protects against invasions that amount to unreasonable searches and seizures.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Terry v.Ohio (1968) ,the U.S.Supreme Court ruled on:


A) stop and frisk
B) the open field doctrine
C) the plain view doctrine
D) the privacy doctrine

E) B) and C)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

According to the plain view doctrine:


A) plain view is an exception to the search warrant requirement.
B) plain view is a Fourth Amendment search.
C) plain view observations always fall outside of the Fourth Amendment restrictions.
D) once in plain view,an item may be searched to confirm that it is able to be seized.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

According to the Supreme Court opinion in U.S.v.White (1971) ,involving a friend wired for sound to the police:


A) a defendant has a constitutionally protected expectation that a person he is conversing with will not reveal the conversation to the police.
B) a person contemplating illegal activities must realize and risk that his friend may be reporting to the police.
C) a suspect's friend may relate the substance of conversations between the two without violating the Fourth Amendment,but the amendment is violated if the friend records those conversations for the police without a warrant.
D) anytime electronic devices are used to obtain evidence,a search warrant is required.

E) B) and C)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In which of the following situations DOES there exist an expectation of privacy?


A) Standing on the street and looking into the living room through open curtains.
B) Climbing over a backyard fence.
C) Observing someone carrying a briefcase.
D) Overhearing a conversation on the street.

E) B) and D)
F) All of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Supreme Court has held that citizens have no reasonable expectation of privacy in which of the following?


A) Telephone conversations.
B) Bank records.
C) Private papers.
D) Letters given to the post office.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In California v.Ciraolo (1986) ,a case involving the police using a plane to fly 1000 feet over Ciraolo's yard to see if he was growing marijuana,the Supreme Court ruled:


A) the plane enhanced the police officer's natural vision and,therefore,the Fourth Amendment was implicated and the officers should be held to the probable cause and warrant requirements.
B) the plane enhanced the officer's vision but they had probable cause based on other evidence.
C) the plane didn't enhance the officer's vision,therefore it was a plain view search outside the purview of the Fourth Amendment.
D) the Fourth Amendment restricts officers from using airplanes to search for drugs.

E) B) and D)
F) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The plain view doctrine does not allow the use of ordinary technological enhancements that are widely available, i.e.flashlights or magnifying glasses.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

According to the Supreme Court in Katz v.U.S. ,involving an electronic listening and recording device attached to the outside of a public telephone booth:


A) the Fourth Amendment protects people,not places.
B) a subjective expectation of privacy confers the Fourth Amendment's protection.
C) there is no search unless there has been a physical intrusion into a place.
D) eavesdropping on a public phone booth is not a search.

E) A) and B)
F) None of the above

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An officer who uses a flash light to look inside the front seat of a locked,illegally parked automobile on a public street and notices a bag of marijuana on a front seat has:


A) conducted an illegal search because he enhanced his normal senses with a flashlight.
B) conducted an illegal search because he looked into the windows of a locked car.
C) not conducted a search at all and his actions are not in violation of the Fourth Amendment because the marijuana was in plain view.
D) conducted a legal search because under the Fourth Amendment he can use a flashlight.

E) A) and B)
F) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 65

Related Exams

Show Answer