A) Nothing because Wendy did not engage in any wrongdoing.
B) She will be required to cede to the corporation all the profits she earned as a result of the breach.
C) She will be required to cede to the corporation only profits she earned as a result of the breach that the corporation can prove by a preponderance of the evidence it lost as a result of her actions.
D) She will be required to cede to the corporation any profits she earned as a result of the breach unless she can by a preponderance of the evidence prove that the corporation lost no sales as a result of her actions.
E) She will be required to cede to the corporation half of any profits she earned as a result of the breach.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Investigative action
B) Shareholder action suit
C) Shareholder's direct suit
D) Shareholder derivative suit
E) Active allocation suit
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Approved directors
B) Associated directors
C) Inside directors
D) Affiliated directors
E) Unaffiliated directors
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Majority; two-thirds
B) Majority; three-fourths
C) Two-thirds; three-fourths
D) One-third; majority
E) Majority; unanimous
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the business judgment rule does not apply in such situations and that so long as there is any business reason for a transaction, a corporation cannot be found liable for a "squeeze-out" resulting in dismissal of the plaintiff's claims.
B) That while the business judgment rule applied, the corporation submitted sufficient evidence to establish legitimate reasons for all questioned transactions and that it, therefore, could not be held liable to the complaining minority shareholder.
C) That a material question of fact as to whether the directors could be found to have engaged in a "squeeze-out" of the beneficiary, causing him harm beyond every other shareholder, and that the case would be remanded for further proceedings.
D) That because he owned over 20% of the stock, the failure to grant the complaining minority shareholder a seat on the board in and of itself was sufficient under the facts presented to establish that the corporation was guilty of behavior constituting an illegal "squeeze-out."
E) That the failure to declare a dividend when sufficient assets existed with which to do so in and of itself was sufficient under the facts presented to establish that the corporation was guilty of behavior constituting an illegal "squeeze-out."
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Preemptive shares
B) Share allowances
C) Allocated shares
D) Stock warrants
E) Share grants
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Oppressive conduct
B) Majority holder misconduct
C) Minority oppression
D) Minority discrimination
E) Disloyal procedure
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Approved directors
B) Outside directors
C) Inside directors
D) Affiliated directors
E) Unaffiliated directors
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) New York
B) California
C) Florida
D) Delaware
E) New Jersey
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) No-par stock
B) Reduced stock
C) Watered stock
D) Less-value stock
E) Unapproved stock
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Approved directors
B) Outside directors
C) Inside directors
D) Affiliated directors
E) Unaffiliated directors
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Meeting agenda
B) Proxy materials
C) Presidential materials
D) Officer materials
E) Meeting proposals
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) 100
B) 50
C) 30
D) 25
E) 10
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It has been adopted at least in part in over half of the states.
B) It has been fully rejected in over half of the states in favor of the Model Business Corporation Act.
C) It has been adopted fully by seventy-five percent of the states.
D) It has been rejected in over half of the states in favor of the Model Corporate Act.
E) There is no Revised Model Business Corporation Act.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 66
Related Exams